http://www.snipd.com/ldroxFollow everything ldrox reads, watches, and enjoys onlineThu, 09 Sep 2010 06:36:21 GMTPyRSS2Gen-1.0.0http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rsshttp://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/index.phphttp://www.homeschooldebate.com/phpBB3/index.phpThu, 02 Jul 2009 14:48:01 GMThttp://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/inowpronounceyouchuckandlarry/large.htmlhttp://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/inowpronounceyouchuckandlarry/large.htmlTue, 09 Jun 2009 16:51:40 GMThttp://groups.google.com/group/region-2-national-prep-team-ld?lnk=http://groups.google.com/group/region-2-national-prep-team-ld?lnk=Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:23:02 GMThttp://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/2010-elections/sca-4-bill-20090219-chaptered.pdfhttp://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/2010-elections/sca-4-bill-20090219-chaptered.pdfThu, 21 May 2009 02:37:58 GMThttps://docs.google.com/DocAction?action=impgml&thid=121550bfe10b3059&attid=0.1https://docs.google.com/DocAction?action=impgml&thid=121550bfe10b3059&attid=0.1Tue, 19 May 2009 01:12:20 GMThttps://mail.google.com/mail/?fs=1&source=atom&shva=1?fs=1&source=atom&shva=1#allhttps://mail.google.com/mail/?fs=1&source=atom&shva=1?fs=1&source=atom&shva=1#allMon, 11 May 2009 13:56:16 GMThttp://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0003/03/lkl.00.html<p>KING: All right, let's get over -- discuss some of the restrictions, and then we'll discuss some of the things that are in news and we'll deal with politics and take some calls. <p> JONES: OK. </p> <p> KING: Why can't black kids date white kids? </p> <p> JONES: OK. </p> <p> KING: Because you didn't take black kids for a long time, right? </p> <p> JONES: Well, 50 percent of American colleges as late as the mid- 1960s still didn't take black students, so... </p> <p> KING: But you were late? </p> <p> JONES: 1970, so we weren't that late. Furman (ph) University in our town took their first black I believe it was in '65, Clemson in '63. So, you know, we were not exclusive in this by any means. </p> <p> KING: But will you admit, as Jerry Falwell has said, you were wrong, you should have taken them? </p> <p> JONES: Yes, we do. We do, of course we do. </p> <p> KING: All right, why -- explain this, why they can't date. </p> <p> JONES: Well, being a Bible believing institution, Larry, we try to base things on Bible principle. The problem we have today is that our principle is so greatly misunderstood. People think we don't let them date because we are racist, in other words to be racist you have to treat people differently. We don't. We don't let them date, because we were trying, as an example, to enforce something, a principle that is much greater than this. </p> <p> We stand against the one-world government, against the coming world of anti-Christ, which is a one world system of blending, of all differences, of blending of national differences, economic differences, church differences, into a big one ecumenical world. The Bible is very clear about this. </p> <p> We said, you know, way back years ago, when we first had a problem, which was -- by the way, we started this principle, back in the mid-'50s, I was a college student at BJU at the time and it was with an Asian and Caucasian is -- we didn't even have black students for another 15 years. So it was not put there as a black thing, I think people need to understand that. </p> <p> KING: So the fear of one world relates back to two people dating? </p> <p> JONES: Now, we realize that a inter-racial marriage is not going to bring in the world the anti-Christ by any means, but if we as Christians stand for Christ and not anti-Christ, and we see -- we are against the one world church. We are against one economy, one political system. </p> <p> We see what the Bible says about this, so we say, OK, if they're going to blend this world -- and inter-racial marriage is a genetic blending, which is a very definite sort of blending -- we said as -- let's put this policy in here, because we are against the one world church and, way back, 17 years ago when I was on your program, I was saying on programs all across America, we are not going to the Supreme Court fighting for our rule and our -- we are fighting for our right to it. There is a religious freedom issue, that's all we ever fought for. </p> <p> KING: You are a private institution, you don't get the tax benefit because -- but you are entitled to the thing -- I'm trying to find out why you have the rule. </p> <p> JONES: Yes. We have the rule, because it was a part of a bigger -- it was a -- it wasn't the rule itself. We can't point to a verse in the Bible that says you shouldn't date or marry inter-racial. </p> <p> KING: You can't back it up? </p> <p> JONES: No, we can't back it up with a verse from the Bible. We never have tried to, we have never tried to do that. But we have said there is a principle here, an overriding principle of the one world government. But let me tell you how insignificant this is. Students never hear it preached. There have been four, five, six generations of students that graduated from there have never heard this preached in our chapel or taught in our school. To us... </p> <p> KING: But it's a rule, though, they know they can't. </p> <p> JONES: It is a rule, it is, but it's the most insignificant thing, but now, we are being defined as a racist school. I mean, that is all the media talks about. KING: Partly, during the era -- you know -- the era of segregation, segregationists said, well, we are not racist, we just think the races should be apart, they should be treated equally, but not together, and that was regarded as a kind of a cop-out. </p></p> http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0003/03/lkl.00.htmlFri, 08 May 2009 11:56:50 GMThttp://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/03/04/bob.jones/http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/03/04/bob.jones/Fri, 08 May 2009 11:54:30 GMThttp://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/soros-credit-default-swaps-spurred-aigs-failure/<p>ng or covering their positions.&#8221; </p> http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/soros-credit-default-swaps-spurred-aigs-failure/Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:03:19 GMT